Notes from a Deep South Webinar presentation by Lisa Ellis — 27 February 2019
The following consensus values that have come through in Lisa’s research: equality, agency, and utility (collective wellbeing).
New Zealand is ahead of the game (globally) in terms of community consultation. Lots of councils are investing in more serious, egalitarian engagement rather than relying on a top down consultation model.
The Dynamic Adaptive Pathways Planning (DAPP) approach (MfE’s 10 step model) and the process followed in Hawke’s Bay’s Clifton to Tangoio Coastal Hazard Strategy are the beginnings of a good model. Minor changes Lisa would like to see are:
Environmental values and future generations
A National Adaptation Plan is in the early scoping stages.
Here are the three priorities MfE has recommended to the Ministers for the Environment and Climate Change. The briefing paper notes "These issues are of such magnitude that they are being felt across New Zealand. They contribute to wider impacts (eg, on housing affordability, tourism revenue and health), which means more than one benefit can be achieved if the right actions are taken — for example, the potential for significant emissions reductions through improved urban design."
Insurance agencies have a lot more flexibility than banks (or councils) when it comes to adapting to climate change. That's because they can adjust their products on an annual basis to manage risks that increase over time. In contrast, when a bank agrees to a mortgage they're generally in it for the long haul.
The stocktake report (page 71) states: "To reduce some of this exposure, insurance is a requirement for residential mortgages in New Zealand, and failing to maintain insurance can trigger default. However, there is a general absence of compliance checks and lack of understanding of how well properties are insured. These leave a risk that many homes may be underinsured which increases banks' exposure to losses."
On first reading this sentence in the briefing from Ministry for the Environment to the new Ministers for the Environment and for Climate Change I thought it mainly related to changing the Resource Management Act away from its current effects-based approach to more of an outcomes focus.
However, the advice recommends complementing regulatory changes with a strong emphasis on non-regulatory actions such as codes of practice, sharing of information, financial incentives and working alongside businesses, sectors or communities to achieve shared outcomes.
This upcoming report could be a really valuable input into NZ's future reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. The purpose of the Biological Emissions Reference Group is "to collaboratively build a robust and agreed evidence base on the opportunities available now and in future to reduce biological greenhouse gas emissions (methane and nitrous oxide) in New Zealand’s primary industries, and what the costs, benefits, and barriers to doing so are."
The threat of nuclear war was a very real fear for me when I was a teenager in the 1980s, and I can imagine climate change (even though a very different type of risk) could also be a very significant fear for today's teenagers. Seeing that things are being done to prepare for the changes ahead will make a big difference to our mental health.
I hope the upcoming report progresses these options for immediate action (listed in the ministerial briefing on page 13):
It won't always be up to councils to be the bearer of bad news to property owners affected by climate change. I learnt last week that a homeowner in an area increasingly affected by coastal hazards has been told that insurance will cover their recent damage from Cyclone Gita, and only one more event in future. Then they will be unable to make further claims.
That means anyone buying that property in future is unlikely to be able to get insurance, and will therefore be unable to gain a mortgage associated with that property.
These are the posts I have shared on social media, all in one place for easy access.